Full interview transcripts online? No thanks.

There has been talk across the Atlantic this week about making journalist’s primary source material and transcipts more readily available online.

Washington Post economic and domestic policy blogger Ezra Klein has called for transcipts to be used alongside traditional write ups, and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has criticised the media for not making use of the huge amount of space available online to host source material.

Klein says: “It’s safer to have your full comments, and the questions that led to them, out in the open, rather than just the lines the author thought interesting enough to include in the article.”

I couldn’t disagree more.

The main point of a journalist is that you, as a consumer, don’t NEED to read through 10 pages before getting to the point.

It is a journalist’s responsibility to tell you the who, what, where, why, when and how in the first couple of paragraphs – not hidden within a 15 minute interview spiel.

Also, there may be the space there to host the material – but what about the audience to read it?

I have no idea who would read a transcript – which often (if you’ve had the pleasure of transcribing anything) doesn’t make sense, has people talking over each other and is full of pauses, ums, ahs and corrections.

So, what it would perhaps mean in reality, is that  journalists would need to turn every last word of an interview into a feature, or at least write it up in a way that is easy to digest for the reader.

Of course, there may be some exceptions – you may get the odd interviewee who is full of top information, which they express in a way that is interesting and engaging.

But it’s highly unlikely that there are enough of them to enable publishing transcripts online to become the norm.

Also, what about the interviewees themselves?

They are trusting (sometimes naively it must be said) that the journalists can turn their rambles into something useful.

Many would cringe at the thought of their unpolished answers being bared for the whole world to see.


5 thoughts on “Full interview transcripts online? No thanks.

  1. Nick Shearing says:

    Are you arguing this because you don’t want the world to see your lame and embarrassing questions Brooke?

  2. Joel Gunter says:

    I think you’ve misrepresented both arguments here slightly. Klein suggests that transcripts should be made available in addition to – not instead of – a traditional feature write-up, so that readers can access the raw materials if they choose to, for whatever reason. Assange didn’t refer to interviews specifically, he simply argued that because of the space available online, more primary source material should be published.

    • brookenolan says:

      Apologies – an oversight on my part with Assange and I’ve amended the blog post accordingly. The rest of the post is simply my views on the thought of all interviews being available online – something I feel would be very time consuming and possibly not utilised even if they where made available. I appreciate the comments though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s